There are fashion obsessions, and
then there is Prada in the ’90s—a universe I seem to orbit endlessly.
It began quietly: a few runway
clips, then entire seasons. Soon I was watching, rewatching, and mentally
cataloguing every Prada show from the late ’80s through the early 2000s. Now,
when an image surfaces, I can almost instinctively place it—season, silhouette,
mood. It’s less a hobby, more a visual memory system shaped by nylon,
minimalism, and subversive elegance.
My research spiralled, as it
does, into archival campaigns and late-night searches through the internet’s
most obscure corners. Vintage listings from Tokyo, Berlin, and Paris became my
reading material. There is something about old Prada—the restraint, the
intelligence—that feels increasingly rare today. I can’t help it; I’m devoted.
Sometimes I imagine a different
timeline. New York in the ’90s. A life lived slightly off-camera but always
within reach of a lens—paparazzi catching a fleeting moment: stepping out of a
cab, shopping downtown, wrapped in understated luxury. A character, really.
Styled impeccably, but never trying too hard. The kind of woman Miuccia Prada
designs for.
The Bowling Bag Era
Reality, of course, looks
different—but not entirely disconnected. Until recently, I was able to set
aside enough to begin collecting pieces I had long admired. Inevitably, I fell
down a very specific rabbit hole: the Spring/Summer 2000 bowling bags. Glossy,
structured, quietly bold—they embody everything I love about that era. Chic
without announcement.
There is a particular
satisfaction in the hunt. Hours spent scrolling through Japanese resale
platforms—arguably the gold standard for pristine vintage—alongside curated
European boutiques. Eventually, I found mine: a Vitello Drive bowling bag in
the exact beige-brown tone I had imagined. It arrived just in time for my
birthday last December, sourced from a Parisian vintage store called Rediscover
Vintage, and it felt oddly fated.
What I didn’t anticipate was the
cultural shift happening in parallel. Carolyn Bessette-Kennedy—long a quiet
reference point for those in the know—has re-emerged at the centre of fashion
consciousness. Her wardrobe, once understated to the point of near anonymity,
is now studied, replicated, and, inevitably, commodified. In the ’90s, while
working at Calvin Klein, she carried simple black Prada bags with an ease that
felt entirely her own.
I wish I could say I had the
foresight to collect those pieces early, before the resurgence. I didn’t.
Instead, I stayed loyal to my bowling bags—my own niche within the archive.
Perhaps that’s the point: true obsession isn’t strategic. It doesn’t follow
trends; it precedes them or ignores them entirely.
There are still pieces I’m chasing— “lemmings,” in the language of vintage forums—scattered across the depths of online shops I probably check too often. I tell myself the right ones will find me when they’re meant to. Optimism, perhaps. Or just habit.
I am a Sagittarius who is a hopeless optimist with a pessimistic introvert alter ego. In my head my alter ego lives in Milan and works in fashion. Yes, she does daydream it since a teenager in late 90s.
Next, I suspect, will be a deeper
dive into Bessette-Kennedy’s Prada bags. Not because they’re trending, but
because they always mattered.
Some things don’t need
rediscovery. Just attention.
article by Burcu Acem
Comments